This guy is young, has name recognition, has national campaign experience, and is incredibly skilled in politics, but on top of all this he has one charictaristic that is allowing him to dominate the media cycle over the past few days. What is this characteristic? He is not in office.
The man is John Edwards.
A glance at what Edwards has been doing over the past five days or so clearly reveals his strategy:
- Call for a clear, quick, defined troop withdraw
- Present a $120 billion universal healthcare proposal
- Bash the Senate Democrats' "non-binding" resolution as weak and ineffective
- Openly use the dirty words "raise taxes"
Whereas Clinton, Obama, and the rest are bound by their positions to be pragmatic and realistic, Edwards has the ability to be partisan and brash, without having to consider the impact his proposals would have. Senator Biden (who is recognized among his party as a foreign policy expert) has criticized Edwards' positions for this very reason: they are unrealistic. This according to the New York Times:
But [Edwards] campaign voice is different, at times angry and more impatient. He said that in his last campaign he was handicapped first by his inexperience as a national candidate, and...that this time he was more seasoned and unshackled, which he believes gives him advantages over his two most prominent rivals, Senators Clinton and Obama.Seasoned and unshackled indeed.
Edwards may currently be in the number 3 position among the Democrats, but beware this non-office holder. He has the freedom to engage in all degrees of politicization without having to account for how his proposed policies would effect the people, the economy, or our national security. This may make him the most popular candidate among the Far Left, but it also may well make him the most dangerous of the Trifecta.
3 comments:
He's very dangerous indeed. Over the past year, it seems as though he has become a self appointed spokesperson for the masses, the millions of working Americans, who are apparently being treated like slaves by the Republican party. Unfortunately, the lifestyle of the man of the people reminds me more of Soviet leaders; speaking about how "we are equal," but living a life that is very very different from the life of the working class.
As a trial lawyer, he made a lot of money through suing, and now he has a wonderful new house to show for it.
http://www.johnlocke.org/site-docs/images/edwardshouse.jpg
Man for the people, or man for himself?
You and I must define the word "dangerous" very differently.
I suppose I should rephrase.
Edwards is a powerhouse at politics, and Republicans should fear him as a dangerous politician, just like pitchers fear Albert Pujols as a dangerous batter.
Post a Comment